Why throw-away code instead of production?

Jun 20, 2009 at 12:30 AM

I'm curious about what this statement means? Can you elaborate a little?

Bling's APIs and constructs are optimized for the fast programming of throw away code as opposed to the careful programming of production code.

Coordinator
Jun 20, 2009 at 1:02 AM
Bling is oriented to playing around and prototyping, but actually it can also be used for production code if you want. The point in Bling's philosophy is that it focuses more on the time to write/get the code working vs. long term maintenance, which is a different focus from from other libraries in general (where a lot of the verbosity seems to be justified for maintenance, understanding reasons).

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:30 AM, ralphtrickey <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:

From: ralphtrickey

I'm curious about what this statement means? Can you elaborate a little?

Bling's APIs and constructs are optimized for the fast programming of throw away code as opposed to the careful programming of production code.

Read the full discussion online.

To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (bling@discussions.codeplex.com)

To start a new discussion for this project, email bling@discussions.codeplex.com

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.

Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com